sponsor links

Fitness pro’s deluxe form kit
Read this book
www.fitnessbusinessforms.com

Fat Loss Action Blueprint
See To Believe
www.fatlossactionblueprint.com/

Marketing Secrets Of Successful Nail Technicians.
Tried And Tested
www.nailtechsuccess.com

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Pentagon disinvites evangelist who scorned Islam

June 2007 file photo of Franklin Graham (left) and his father Billy. — Reuters pic

WASHINGTON, April 23 — The US Army yesterday withdrew an invitation to a Christian evangelist to speak at a Pentagon prayer service next month following an outcry over his references to Islam as a violent religion.

Franklin Graham, the son of famed evangelist Billy Graham, said in a statement he regretted the Army’s decision and would keep praying for US troops.

The invitation prompted a harsh reaction, including from a prominent US Muslim group that said Graham’s appearance before Pentagon personnel would send the wrong message as the United States fights wars in Muslim countries.

In an interview last year with CNN, Graham said “true Islam” was too violent to be practised in the United States.

“You can’t beat your wife. You cannot murder your children if you think they’ve committed adultery or something like that, which they do practise in these other countries,” he said.

“I don’t agree with the teachings of Islam and I find it to be a very violent religion.”

The interview can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByovBdIRV2o.

The Army said it did not invite Graham to the May 6 event organised through the Pentagon Chaplain’s office. The invitation was instead extended by the private, Colorado-based National Day of Prayer Task Force.

“Once the Army leadership became aware that Rev. Graham was speaking at this event, we immediately recognised it as problematic,” said Colonel Tom Collins, an Army spokesman.

“The bottom line here is that his presence would be inappropriate. His past statements are not consistent with the multi-faith emphasis and inclusiveness of this event.”

Graham acknowledged the decision, saying in a statement: “I will continue to pray that God will give them guidance, wisdom and protection as they serve this great country.”

The National Day of Prayer Task Force called the Pentagon’s decision part of an “assault on religious freedom and people of faith” driven by groups including the government and media.

“The Pentagon, representing the most powerful military in the world, melted like butter and withdrew the invitation,” it said, citing opposition by “a small group of naysayers.”

President Barack Obama and the military have repeatedly sought to assure the Muslim world that the US fight against insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan should not be viewed as a war against Islam.

Former President George W. Bush heightened those concerns shortly after the Sept 11 attacks on New York and Washington in 2001 when he referred to his war on terrorism as a “crusade,” a remark critics warned raised images of Christian knights attacking Muslim cities during the Middle Ages.

Franklin Graham gave the benediction at Bush’s 2001 presidential inauguration and famously declared after the Sept 11 attacks: “We’re not attacking Islam but Islam attacked us.” He called Islam a “very evil and wicked religion.”

This year, the military discovered a US arms manufacturer had embossed biblical citations on rifle scopes sent to Afghanistan and Iraq. The manufacturer halted the practice.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation, which also voiced outrage over the rifle scopes, wrote a letter of protest earlier this week to Defence Secretary Robert Gates over Graham’s invitation.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations said the invitation was damaging to the US image.

“To have an individual who calls Islam evil and claims Muslims are enslaved by their faith speak at the Pentagon sends entirely the wrong message,” said the group’s national executive director, Nihad Awad. — Reuter

Islamic backlash aimed at moderates

APRIL 28 — This past week has seen the spotlight turned on Islam on the world stage again.

In the United States, a “South Park” episode featuring a parody of the Prophet Muhammad saw death threats to the show’s co-creators courtesy of the site Radicalmuslim.com.

However, unlike the Jyllands-Posten cartoon episode of 2007, the general public’s reaction has been one of support for the show’s brand of equal opportunity comedy.

Seattle satirical cartoonist Molly Norris has even proposed May 20th as “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” and that initiative appears to be gaining ground with even schools set to join in.

In France and Belgium, laws were passed to ban the burqa in public, including for tourists. Earlier this month, a woman driver wearing hijab was for the first time fined by French police for driving while “not having a clear field of vision.”

In England in late March, Muslim leaders were publicly criticised by Oxford University academic Nick Chatrath who claims that in the face of growing radicalisation in Britain, “Muslim leaders are ignoring extremists’ points of view and glossing over some of the more unsavoury parts of Islam’s texts.”

Look a bit further back to November, you’ll find Switzerland lawmakers banning the construction of new mosque minarets. At around the same time, more than 100 Western-based organisations signed a petition against the Organisation of the Islamic Conferences’ (OIC) proposed United Nations resolution on blasphemy or “defamation of religions” — the clearest mass opposition to a non-conflict related UN proposal in recent memory.

Observers say these developments hint at a larger shift in the West’s general attitude towards Islam and Islamic culture — one that was previously characterised by cultural relativism and tolerance, but now progressively less so.

The target of some of these retaliations have also shifted — directed less and less at the perceived radical fringe elements of Islam but more towards its mainstream, which is increasingly being accused of not doing enough to curb its more extreme co-religionists.

In Western European societies, this eroding tolerance of multiculturalism is also pushing back against what is perceived as the developing “Arabification” and Islamisation of Europe — most notably due to the superior birth rates (ratios as high as 8:1) of naturalised citizens that migrated in droves from North Africa and the Middle East in the past 30 to 40 years.

With increasing population comes increasing demands for the preservation of a traditional way of life — ones that are typically in direct contrast to modern European values.

It is beyond the scope of this article to detail the complicated sentiments that have developed over decades of open-door migration policies and an earlier lax attitude towards cultural assimilation among the Western European nations.

My own insights have been assisted by reading the late Orianna Falacci’s diatribe against the Islamisation of Europe — her fist, the fiery The Rage and The Pride followed the more measured The Force of Reason. Other popular ones include Bat Ye’Or’s Eurabia, Mark Steyn’s America Alone and Walter Laquer’s The Last Days of Europe.

As a matter of comparison these are not dissimilar to the righteous anger-tinged literature of colonised peoples who rile against what they view as the parasitic behaviour of their cultural imperialists.

Some would say it’s karma and nothing short of a comeuppance for the West given its hundreds of years of transgressions on the rest of the world.

Nevertheless, these episodes collectively paint the picture of a more mainstream and public face of retaliation against Islam and its symbols in Europe and in the US.

To a great extent, they are aimed at testing both Islam and Islamic culture’s insistence on exemption from criticism; something that has never gone down well with societies steeped in Freedom of Speech.

The difference is that this time more of their people’s representatives are being vocal, backed by a growing majority of the public, almost as if a sieve has been breached.

To be fair, it is not just Islam that is being rounded on, for today in the West criticism of *all* religions is at its height.

New Atheists

In recent years, religion’s chief critics have been the so-called New Atheists: Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Dan Dennett. Arguments aside, they have proven very successful at gaining mind share and public influence given their bestselling books, full-house debates, popular lecture tours and general availability via YouTube.

In the Islamic sphere specifically, I would add Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Infidel and The Caged Virgin, as one who stands apart as Islam’s most vocal critic. In her reaction to the “South Park” episode on CNN, she has called on more people to lend support, saying: “if the entire entertainment business were to take this on, and just show how ridiculous this is, that there’ll eventually be too many people to threaten.”

To put things into perspective, what these New Atheists charge is that all religions, and specifically Islam, have been granted an undeserved special exemption from criticism for too long.

Christianity and Judaism are cited as successfully reformed religions because they have had to contend with a high level of criticism for a lot longer (including comedy and satire at the sharper end of the spectrum), hence this “immunity” must no longer be granted to Islam.

Another oft-repeated argument is that Judaism and Christianity have gone through many schisms and theological revisions that have shaved off their hard edges and made them conform better with modern times while retaining the tenets of beliefs that continue to provide comfort and reassurance to adherents.

The New Atheists argue this is not yet the case with Islam. Islam’s loudest voices continue to belong to the radical mullahs, while the moderate ulamas are often having to legitimise the literalist interpretation without outwardly or directly condemning.

The only recent high profile exemption was in March when Pakistani Islamic scholar Tahir ul-Qadri issued a 600-page anti-terrorism and suicide bombing fatwa “without any excuses, any pretexts, or exceptions” — the first of its kind in the world (e.g. we had never had any from the influential Saudi ulamas or Al-Azhar Universty).

Yet what must be the New Atheists’ most counter-intuitive argument, and a favourite one wheeled out by supporters, is the accusation that it is in fact the moderate elements of Islam that give cover to the radical elements, particularly when they do not condemn their co-religionists harshly and often enough.

And it just so happens that Islam’s moderates are where the slew of new retaliations are being squarely aimed at. In not so many words, it is meant to force them to “take over” the representation of Islam from the radicals and jihadists: either conform or reform, or risk more censure.

In this confluence of events the drawn lines are clearest for Islamic fundamentalists. These actions may all be considered provocations by the kuffar which should be met by opposition and if capable, by force. On these matters, the fundamentalist factions are quite unanimously united.

The sentiment among Islamic moderates are less aligned. There exists varying degrees of reactions ranging from disagreement to resignation, even compromise and acceptance.

So while all this is happening in earnest halfway around the world, where does that leave us here in Malaysia, where we have made it our business professing to be a shining example of a moderate, modern Islamic nation?

Do our moderates eventually stand up and claim ground or do the literalist ulamas continue to lay claim to represent Islamic authenticity while using “arguments from authority” to suppress other points-of-view?

Indeed, the world is getting much smaller now, and it won’t be long before these same issues, in their local flavours and colours, lie on our doorstep — if they aren’t already seeping into our collective consciousness now.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Alcohol breath tests for Muslims at clubs

PATRONS seeking some Friday night fun at six entertainment outlets in Bandar Sunway were interrupted by a joint operation carried out by the authorities.

Officers from the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (JAIS), Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission barged into the clubs at about 11pm.

After checking the customers’ identity, they conducted alcohol breath tests on the Muslims.

The operation went on smoothly at all outlets, except for one where two Middle Eastern tourists were found having alcoholic drink bottles on their tables.

Here you go: A patron (right) at a club in Bandar Sunway taking the alcohol breath test conducted by an officer involved in the operation.

The two felt uncomfortable taking the tests under the watchful eyes of the cameramen and the JAIS officers had to persuade them to breath into the device in a separate room.

Their test results were negative.

Six Muslims who were found drinking in one of the outlets in the well-known shopping complex would be charged under Section 18 (1) of the Selangor Syariah Crime Enactment 1995.

They face a fine of not more than RM3,000, or a jail term not more than two years, or both.

JAIS’ enforcement department assistant planning and strategic director Shahrom Maarof said the rest of the 11 Muslim patrons and workers found in the premises would be asked to attend a counselling session with the department.

“Although they didn’t drink this time, we have to remind them not to come back here and consume alcohol,” he said.

Shahrom said the breath test kit was effective in detecting alcohol levels.

“It is able to pick up the alcohol content, no matter how small the amount is. We once recorded a reading at 0.03 and proved that the person had consumed alcohol,” he said.

MPSJ president Datuk Adnan Md Ikshan said the enforcement master plan was introduced last month with emphasis on gambling dens and entertainment outlets

Obama to host Muslim entrepreneurs

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama will lay a key plank of his strategy to mend ties with the Islamic world on Monday when he hosts a summit to boost economic development in Muslim nations.


In a step the White House hopes will help shift relations beyond decades of talk about terrorism and conflict, Obama will bring entrepreneurs from 50 countries to Washington on Monday and Tuesday to spur economic ties.

“This is not simply an exercise in public outreach or public diplomacy,” said Ben Rhodes, one of Obama’s top national security advisors.

“We believe that this is the beginning of forging kind of very tangible partnerships in a critical area.”

The president pledged to host the summit in a landmark speech in Cairo last June, when he also called for a “new beginning” to relations between the United States and the Islamic world.

“One of the principal goals of that vision was to broaden our relationship, which has been dominated by a few different issues, a small set of issues, for at least the last decade, and going back further than that,” an administration official said ahead of the meeting.


“We don’t see this as a replacement for our work on things like Middle East peace or work on counter-terrorism, our work on Iran. We see this as part of establishing a more multifaceted set of relationships. It is yet another pillar.”

Around 250 entrepreneurs will attended the summit from countries across the Muslim world — where America’s image is tarnished by wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal and the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

Obama is expected to discuss ways of improving access to capital, funding for technology innovation and exchange programs, as the United States tries to better its image in the eyes of the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims.

The delegates will vary from 20-year-old entrepreneurs to established figures like Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus, who won a Nobel prize for his work on small-scale lending.

As part of Obama’s plan the United States is poised to award contracts through its multi-million-dollar Global Technology and Innovation Fund, designed to spur investments in the Muslim world.

The government-backed Overseas Private Investment Corporation, which is running the competition, has received a deluge of applications, which officials say is itself a sign of improving ties.

Each chunk of funding awarded by OPIC is expected to be worth between 25 and 150 million dollars.

Polls show Obama has won plaudits across the globe since taking office in January 2009. But nearly a year on from his Cairo speech, Muslims remain deeply suspicious of the United States.

A recent BBC World Service poll of attitudes in 28 countries showed that Turks and Pakistanis still overwhelmingly believe the United States is a negative influence on the world.

The failure to broker a Middle East peace and still-bloody wars in Muslim countries loom large.


“This is a generational issue, this is something that is going to take time,” the official said. -- AFP

Sunday, April 18, 2010

British Muslims demand apology over shooting range mosques

Britain's Prince Charles (right) walks with British soldiers at a British military camp in Helmand province, Afghanistan on March 25, 2010. — Reuters pic

LONDON, April 8 — A group of British Muslims demanded an apology from the British Ministry of Defence today after it said replica mosques were being used on a military firing range in northern England.

The Bradford Council for Mosques (BCM), an umbrella organisation for faith schools and mosques in the area, called for the green-domed structures to be taken down and wanted assurance they would not be used again.

“The structures do symbolise mosques,” BCM spokesman Ishtiaq Ahmed told Reuters.

“Mosques are our places of worship, they are places of peace, and for anyone to suggest that they are potential zones of danger and should be shot at is really not acceptable.”

The one-dimensional hardboard structures in Catterick, North Yorkshire, are not used as direct targets, but are intended to provide a more “realistic” background for soldiers training ahead of deployment in Afghanistan, a military source said.

Other “generic eastern silhouettes” used include palm trees and irrigation ditches.

But the BCM’s Ahmed said the site did not bear any resemblance to what British forces were experiencing in Afghanistan.

“If they had a replica of a street or a village in Afghanistan with a mosque as a kind of location point we would understand that, but these are simply six or seven structures in the direct shooting line which anyone looking at would come to the obvious conclusion that they are mosques.”

About 9,500 British troops are currently stationed in Afghanistan as part of the US-led coalition fighting an increasingly bloody Taliban insurgency.

The Ministry of Defence apologised for any offence, saying it was never the intention for the structures to look like or replicate mosques.

“We are seeking a meeting with representatives from the Muslim community to hear their concerns in order to discuss the way forward,” a spokesman said in a statement. — Reuters

Muslim cleric ordered out of US in subway plot case

NEW YORK, April 16 — A federal judge yesterday ordered a Muslim cleric to leave the United States for lying to the FBI in connection with a probe into a plot to blow up New York City subways, a US justice official said.

In a sentencing hearing in Brooklyn, US District Judge Frederic Block told Ahmad Afzali, 39, he must leave within 90 days or be deported to his native Afghanistan, said Robert Nardoza, spokesman for the US Attorney’s Office in Brooklyn.

Afzali faced up to six months in prison.

An imam in the New York City borough of Queens, he was arrested in 2009 as part of an investigation into what US Attorney General Eric Holder called one of the most serious security threats to the United States since the Sept 11 attacks in 2001.

Afzali was accused of tipping off Najibullah Zazi that he was under investigation, forcing authorities to bring Zazi in for questioning sooner than planned. Earlier this year Zazi admitted he had received weapons and training from al Qaeda and plotted a suicide attack on the city’s subways in rush hour.

The cleric, a self-proclaimed pro-American imam who co-operated with police in previous investigations, lied about the tip-off when questioned by the FBI, prosecutors said.

Afzali pleaded guilty last month to charges of lying to law enforcement officials in a deal with prosecutors who agreed to drop a more serious charge of obstructing a terrorism investigation. He agreed to waive his right to appeal.

His defence team sought to portray him as an unwitting suspect, who had no knowledge of what Zazi was planning, but the prosecution contended that the cleric was deliberately misleading law enforcement.

“Afzali is many things, but naive is not one of them. He knew that what he did was wrong, and that is the reason why he hid it from the NYPD (New York Police Department) and later lied about it to the FBI,” prosecutors said in a recent court document said.

Zazi, who moved to Queens from Afghanistan as a teenager and attended a mosque led by Afzali, will be sentenced in June. — Reuters

Muslim NGOs lodge police reports against Asri and Malaysiakini

KUALA LUMPUR, April 18 — A Muslim non-governmental organisation(NGO) has lodged a police report against former Perlis mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin (picture) over an article posted on Malaysiakini.

It also filed a police report against Malaysiakini for posting the article entitled “Cabaran Gerakan Pembaharuan” (Challenges Confronting Reform Movement) on April 4.

The reports were filed by Negeri Sembilan Sofa Foundation deputy president Yusri Mohamad at the Dang Wangi police district headquarters here today.

Speaking to reporters, Yusri, who was accompanied by 50 representatives of several Muslim NGOs, claimed that the article violated the Sedition Act 1948 for allegedly insulting Islam and the institution of Malay rulers.

Other NGOs present were Pertubuhan Kebajikan al-Jamiatul Khairiah, Klang Islamic College Alumni Association (Alkis), Madrasah Islamiyah Malaysia Union (Itmam), Pertubuhan Muafakat Sejahtera Masyarakat Malaysia (Muafakat), Integrated Muslim Associations of Selangor (Iman) and Sinar Damsyik Association (Persidam).

A Dang Wangi police spokesman confirmed receiving the report. Similar police reports against Asri and Malaysiakini were also lodged in other states, said Yusri. — Bernama

 

blogger templates | Make Money Online